Christopher Bollyn. The Pentagon's Abandonment of its Own People on 9/1. November 2, 2. 01. The Pentagon's functioning," Rumsfeld said on 9/1.

Archives and past articles from the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News, and Philly.com. There a few different ways to watch NFL games live online: Cable network streams. If you have a cable subscription and you aren’t near a TV during NFL games, you. Un libro (del latín liber, libri) es una obra impresa, manuscrita o pintada en una serie de hojas de papel, pergamino, vitela u otro material, unidas por un lado (es. Que vous soyez débutant ou sportif confirmé, vous trouverez chez RunAttitude un accompagnement pour faire votre choix parmi un large assortiment de chaussures.

If you were looking for the article about the character, then see SpongeBob SquarePants. · Contributor. I write about stocks, the economy and all in between.except fashion. full bio → Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. A wide variety of online and print media sources throughout the world are sharing articles about Project Management Institute. · Jeff Schmitt Contributor. I write about organizational behavior from the bottom up. full bio → Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.

The Pentagon's 9/1. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, flanked by Secretary of the Army Tom White, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton, and Senators John Warner (R- VA), and Carl Levin (D- MI), the Ranking Member and Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Why did the Pentagon fail to rescue its own people, and why did it turn the site of an "act of war" over to the F. B. I.? Carol Valentine gave me a binder with some of her articles about 9/1. One of the articles about the attack on the Pentagon is titled, "Pentagon RESCUE? Open Bloody Questions.."Valentine raises many questions in this article, some better than others, but the one that strikes me as most important is this: Why did the Pentagon turn over the site of an "act of war" to the F.

B. I. on 9/1. 1? WHY WAS F. B. I. PUT IN CHARGE OF PENTAGON SITE? We know the F. B. I. was in charge of the Pentagon site because the Secretary of the Army, Thomas E. White, said so during the Sept. Dept. of Defense News Briefing.

Q: Mr. Secretary? A: Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld: Yes? Q: Can you describe the fire- fighting efforts that are going on right now in that corridor and the search- and- rescue efforts that are beginning? A: Rumsfeld: Can I describe them? Q: Yeah. A: Rumsfeld: Why don't we let the Secretary of the Army, who was out there with me a few minutes ago and has been talking to the incident commander on the site.

A: Secretary of the Army Thomas E. White: I think it's fair to say at this point that the fire is contained, and will shortly, if not already, be sufficiently controlled to allow entry into the building.

That entry will be supervised by the FBI, who are in charge of the site, assisted by the fire departments that are present. We, on the Army side, will support them as they go in the building and search for casualties and bring them out, then we will support them in dealing with that. That's what's going on on the ground. Carol Valentine described this as the military abandoning their responsibilities and turning the military site of an act of war over to civilian authorities: RUMSFELD, MILITARY, HAND THEIR JOBS TO FBILet's go back to the beginning, and state the obvious. The Pentagon is not your ordinary run- of the- mill office building.

The Pentagon is the military headquarters for the mightiest military power on earth. It is the home of the US Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines, and Special Operations.

According to the Official Story, the 9- 1. Pentagon was an act of war. Rumsfeld and the top brass had lawful jurisdiction over the piece of real estate on which the "act of war" had just occurred; the Pentagon building was a war zone. But what did Rumsfeld, Gen.

Shelton, and the top brass do? On September 1. 1, 2. FBI — a division of the civilian Department of Justice.

Robert S. Mueller had just been appointed FBI Director the week before on September 4.)This may sound like a small detail to some people, but it is of crucial importance. It is exactly what happened in New York City and Shanksville, Pennsylvania: The F. B. I. took over the sites and investigation, actions which resulted in the destruction of evidence and cover- up of the truth. On 9/1. 1 the F. B.

I. was under the control of a son of the Mossad, Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the Israeli- American dual national who ran the Criminal Division of the Dept. Justice and who was in charge of the investigation. Under Chertoff, rather than carrying out a blue- ribbon investigation of 9/1. F. B. I. oversaw the cover- up of the worst act of mass murder and terrorism in U. S. history. A proper investigation of 9/1. Michael Chertoff.

Bollyn 9/1. 1 Presentation in Washington, D. C. November 2, 2. Christopher Bollyn's presentation in Washington, D. C., on September 1. Bollyn Interview with Adam Green. September 2. 3, 2.

Recommended: Bollyn Interview on War on Terror. September 2. 3, 2. Christopher Bollyn was interviewed last fall at the Open Mind Conference in Denmark. The video of the interview provides an excellent analysis of the Israeli construct known as the War on Terror and explains how 9/1.

This 1. 8- minute video is recommended viewing. Christopher Bollyn is currently on a book tour in the USA.

Support his efforts to expose the deception of our time. Donate by Pay. Pal to:  bollyn@bollynbooks. A Blank Check for Perpetual War. Watch Coldwater Dailymotion there. July 8, 2. 01. 7"Under U.

S. law it is illegal for any American to provide money or assistance to al Qaeda, ISIS or other terrorist groups. If you or I gave money, weapons, or support to al Qaeda or ISIS, we would be thrown in jail.

Yet the U. S. government has been violating this law for years, quietly supporting allies and partners of al Qaeda, ISIL, Jabhat Fateh al Sham, and other terrorist groups with money, weapons, and intelligence support, in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government." – Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D- Hawaii) introducing the Stop Arming Terrorists Act, December 8, 2.

The AUMF resolution passed after 9/1. Three days after 9/1.

U. S. Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF),  a joint resolution giving the President the authority "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 1. Signed into law by President George W.

Bush on September 1. AUMF is the Congressional authorization that funds the War on Terror.

Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D- Calif.) was the only member of Congress to vote against the resolution. In her statement of September 1. Lee said: We are not dealing with a conventional war. We cannot respond in a conventional manner. I do not want to see this spiral out of control… we must be careful not to embark on an open- ended war with neither an exit strategy nor a focused target.

We cannot repeat past mistakes. A BLANK CHECK FOR PERPETUAL WARRep. Lee's warning about the AUMF spiraling "out of control" and leading to "an open- ended war" has proved prophetic. In the first sixteen years of the War on Terror the AUMF resolution has been used for more than 3. Operation Inherent Resolve, for example, the current U. S. military operation in Iraq and Syria against the militant group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is one of the 3. ISIL did not even exist in 2.

In September 2. 01. AUMF, President Obama claimed that he had the authority he needed to wage war against ISIL. After years of persistent effort, on June 2. Rep. Lee succeeded in getting her amendment that would end the 2.

AUMF authorization through the House Appropriations Committee. If the final funding bill goes through with Lee's amendment it will give Congress 2. The 2. 00. 1 authorization would be repealed at the end of the eight- month period of debate."I've been working on this for years and years and years. I'm just really pleased that Republicans and Democrats today really understood what I've been saying and I've been explaining for the last 1. Lee said after her amendment passed the committee. Before the vote, the congressmen who spoke in support of Lee's amendment said it was high time that Congress debate the authorization for the War on Terror.

Several of them stressed that Congress had failed the members of the U. S. military by not debating the wars and operations to which they had been sent.“Any administration can rely on this blank check to wage endless war,” Lee told the committee members before the vote. Many of us can also agree that a robust debate and vote is necessary, long overdue, and must take place."THIS MADNESS MUST END Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D- Hawaii) is another courageous congresswoman who has taken a stand against the duplicity of the War on Terror. In December 2. 01.

Rep. Gabbard, an Iraq war veteran, introduced legislation which would prohibit the U.